Showing posts with label philosophy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label philosophy. Show all posts

9 Dec 2018

A question of integrity

What, pray tell, is integrity? For most of us, it is the idea of having a strong moral position, a conscious choice to be honest, upright, and most importantly, the ability to resist temptation to use positions of influence and power for personal gain, or the gain of friends and family.

Sadly, my observations – which I have documented in case proof was needed – for the past 10 years or so indicates that integrity is sadly lacking within the PNM fold. Let me step aside here for a moment: that statement, particularly the acronym ‘PNM’ will certainly raise the hackles of people on two fronts – racism, and political division between ‘Indians’ and ‘Afros’ – but that is the nature of the beast. Hopefully, some will settle down to read further where explain my position. And note this sentence carefully: this does not mean that I approve of or that I have not observed the same with other political parties!

My introduction to integrity within the PNM started with the Rowley saga of Landate. From all accounts in the public domain – which I will not rehash – there appeared to be a prima facie case of loss (or lack) of integrity on the part of Rowley with regard to materials to be used for a hospital project ending up at a private building project.

Still sticking with the team of integrity, the then Integrity Commission rejected the idea of procedural integrity and did not give the then minister an opportunity to be heard. This is a breach of the natural rules of justice, and so, the matter was dropped, and the entire Integrity Commission was forced to resign.

Another incident involved Stone Capital, and Andre Monteil and the Home Mortgage Bank. Don’t forget:

  • Monteil was treasurer of the PNM
  • Monteil was the group financial director of CL Financial, the parent company of Clico and the chairman of Clico Investment Bank.
  • The shares were initially Clico's.
  • The sale was facilitated by a 2007 amendment to the Home Mortgage Bank Act (coincidently passed by a PNM administration).
  • Clico provided the funds to Monteil to purchase its shares for himself.

    Joan Yuille-Williams gave out some $46 million over a period of four years, in secret scholarships (non-advertised). Lest readers forget, I point out the following:

    • A beneficiary to the tune of $500,000 worth was Laurel Lezama, daughter-in-law of Louis lee Sing, PNM financier and politician.
    • No record is available on whether that “scholarship” was ever repaid.

      In the Express of April 15, 2010 there was a picture of Port of Spain South MP Marlene McDonald giving away cheques to her constituents. Whose money was that?

      Don’t forget, in questions on integrity arose when it was revealed that Marlene McDonald’s common-law ‘husband’ Michael Carew was granted an HDC house by Marlene using her influence. Mr Carew and his brother were also beneficiaries of grants from the ministry headed by Marlene McDonald. Integrity it seems fell to the wayside.

      And today’s Newsday once again has Marlene McDonald proving once more that she does not know what integrity means (09/12/2018 – https://newsday.co.tt/2018/12/09/i-protect-my-friends/).

      “The man has worked under three ministries led by McDonald since she entered politics in 2007. He began in the ministry of community development, culture and gender affairs. From 2007-2010, McDonald was the minister in charge of that ministry. Following the 2015 general election, McDonald was appointed housing minister and it was then the “nice man” was hired at the People’s Issues Resolution Co-ordinating Unit (PIRCU) at the housing ministry.”

      As always, what I have written above can be easily found in the public domain; I am a scribe collecting and collating.

      Readers may wonder why I pay so much attention to integrity, honesty, ethics et cetera. After all, aren’t lawyers supposed to be bereft of these qualities? Perhaps it is my own personal make up that keeps me alive to these issues. Perhaps it is because within legal training there is a lot of philosophy, ethics and integrity. I would like to think that I will not lose this perspective. Whenever I feel myself falling short, I hope I am reminded to revisit my online postings and realign my moral compass.

      15 Mar 2015

      Fear about email links?

      Over the last two years I’ve been tracking the behaviour of some of my closer contacts on a particular issue.

      On occasions I would have sent them material that I thought would have been of interest to them. Some of my e-correspondence (emails, forum posts, text (sms), and chat messages e.g. WhatsApp) have contained BITLY links. These are hyperlinks that shorten long web addresses. They are called short-links. There were a number of reasons for sending bitly links.

      1. The links are only about 10 characters instead of say 30 or 40.
      2. Short-links use up less space if sending text messages and make it easier to redistribute.
      3. I could track how many times those links were hit by those I had sent them to or if they sent them on to others. (Don’t be stupid: I wouldn’t know who exactly clicked the short-link but because I created it, I would know that that particular link I sent was clicked, and how many times – even if redistributed. So I’m not invading anybody’s privacy.)

      fearOn a handful off occasions my contacts have responded, “Is that a virus link?” Or ‘I was scared to click it so I didn’t’. I mean these are people who know me; people of above average cognitive status.. So why the devil would I want to send them a link to some virus or some other nefarious activity? And that right there is the disconnect between cognition and emotion. They know it’s me but their emotions are saying ‘This could be some sort of spam or fake email from him, I dare not click this else the world may blow up and I with it’. Well yes – emotions don’t actually say anything – they’re silent things that have no real language in a form of words.

      The results of my study give me an estimate that of publicly and privately distributed shortlinks, the hit rate is very small compared to my expectation. So if I would have expected 10 hits over 1 week, I’d only get about 2.

      Of course there are a zillion other reasons why people don’t hit these links as frequently as I might have expected.  And naysayers would argue:

      1. They actually don’t like you or your junk.
      2. They’re not interested as much as you might think about what you send them.
      3. To be fair people are busy – aren’t they? Not everybody has time like you to spend hours on the internet.
      4. There’s a flaw in your link tracking system.
      5. Just because people tolerate you doesn’t mean they have to like you or your stuff!!
      6. [.. yadda.. yadda …yadda]

      And naysayers of course have absolutely no knowledge of my contacts, their interests, my interests or the degree of match in those interests – but they feel a need to defend simply because they’re similarly afflicted. And no – I’m not saying that people ought not to be cautious about e-correspondence and what links they click! And I’m not saying that everybody is obliged to click every link I send them. Jeeze!!

      The internet is the greatest revolution in history – this is the best time in the history of mankind to be alive – to be in touch with our kind out there. But guess what? People are so busy and scared that they are crippled from taking part in this grand spectacle in our humanity. It adds to my world view that the average human being is a timid anxiety-ridden block of flesh gifted with the higher functions of a neocortex - but ruled by a primitive evolutionary remnant buried deep in their subcortex, which rules over them evermore.

      19 Oct 2014

      How the mind works (or NOt).

      The Captain, as many will know, has longstanding issues with the workings of minds – and by extension failures of the mind to work properly (aka stupidity and madness). It’s been some 20-odd years now that I (the Captain, for those who do not know) have been studying the ‘thing’.  By mind I include brain – as I see the two as inseparable. [And I’m not at this stage about to deviate to debate whether the soul is a separate and independent inhabitant of the brain. For those who believe mind and soul are separate and separable, I simply say, submit yourself to me with a request for some brain damage, and we’ll see what happens next about your soul. Jeez.. I always have to distract myself with all sorts of lame arguments that people are likely to come up with – so bare with me or not!].

      Right – back on topic, if I may. No – I’m not about to give you the secrets to the workings of the mind/brain. What I will say today – as I do – is that in the last 10 years, there has been an explosion of information and research on certain aspects of how the mind functions (and by extension ‘not’). The unconscious mind is something that people are likely to think, “Oh it’s that subconscious thing – innit – nothing new there. Go away.. it’s old hat!!!” People who go like that – even in the privacy of their own heads -  I immediately would classify as idiots. Tough if you come to feel insulted.

      The Unconscious is even deeper than what people would conceptualise as ‘the subconscious’. Oooo.. this could get scary.. and when people get scared they look away!! Do I care?! You don’t believe me – so look here and click the image (at right) to read more:

      Or – don’t click it – if you know you know it all, or you spitefully decide not to click it or read further.

      Sure – it’s all theory some will say – and that’s fine for them. Some of such people have never seen God but still believe in God, and there is even less tangible (hard) evidence for a God [evidence is different to inferences and reasoning for]. But no, God still exists – and is not a theory for them. But all this ‘psychobabble’ will be categorised as ‘theory’ and dismissed very quickly. I’m always amused by all this.

      If there was something in you, like an unwelcome influence over your mind, imperceptibly controlling your responses to the world you interact with – I suspect you’d want to know about it. Well, here is the equivalent. The Unconscious controls how you react to the world and people. It orchestrates all ‘above’ it – and I’m betting that 90-something percent of all people do not know much about it. Did I say it is evil? No – I did not!!! If you even fleetingly thought so, that was your ‘subconscious’ and ‘unconscious’ leading you to react in that way. Implied meaning flashed before you, where none is so expressed. I was simply giving an analogy to awake your consideration (I said nothing about evil nor did I imply such).

      What most of us know as ‘the mind’ is that little 10% (or so) at the top that we are aware of, in our daily activities. But make no mistake, the mind’s actions are quite often affected by that 90% or so that is below the surface of awareness. So – I’m not here to tell you all about how it works, because that would be the subject of a few PhD theses. However, it is for anyone interested in this, to springboard from here onto Google to see what more there is. Of course, no one need be interested in any of this – the human race has survived for thousands of years without any of this knowledge. Ahhh.. but will it survive that much longer without recognition and action on it – is the big issue?

      =========

      Supplemental reading:

      1. The unconscious mind at work
      2. Think Different: The Merits of Unconscious Thought in Preference Development and Decision Making

      12 Apr 2014

      Fifteen observations on stupid statements and stupid people.

      Having reflected on another of Kevin's brilliant editorials I wish to add my own observations:

      1. Stupid statements are generated more often than not by stupid people.
      2. Seemingly intelligent people are also capable of generating stupid statements.
      3. Rocks, bricks, sticks, stones and lower forms of animal life cannot be expected to generate stupid statements.
      4. Stupid statements are therefore necessarily human-generated.
      5. Stupid statements can be expected to exceed the number of stupid people in existence.
      6. Stupid statements tend to accumulate over time even after stupid people have departed to another world. 
      7. The number of stupid statements generated by stupid people depends primarily but not exclusively on their stupidity quotient and the stupidity of their audience.
      8. Stupidity quotient can be functions of both high and low IQ, and political status. 
      9. Stupidity can be multifactorial.
      10. Stupid people tend not to know they are stupid, or how stupid they are.
      11. Little self-restraint can therefore be expected to come from stupid-people generating stupid statements.
      12. Stupid people tend to be oversensitive, impulsive and over-reactive and to call those who are wise ‘arrogant’ (and other defamatory adjectives/or adjectival phases).
      13. Stupid people tend to use the same stupid logic they use, to argue away their stupidity and in so doing tend to generate even more stupid statements.
      14. Stupidity seriously endangers the survival of the human race.
      15. Stupidity of dead people also endangers the survival of the human race.
         

      13 Aug 2012

      The Gods must be CRAZY!

      Regarding the flooding…

      And here you find civilized man. Civilized man refused to adapt himself to his environment; instead, he adapted his environment to suit him. So he built cities, roads, vehicles, machinery, and he put up power lines to run his labour-saving devices. But somehow he didn't know where to stop. The more he improved his surroundings to make life easier, the more complicated he made it.

      So now his children are sentenced to 10-15 years of school, just to learn how to survive in this complex and hazardous habitat they were born into. And civilized man, who refused to adapt to his surroundings, now finds he has to adapt and re-adapt every hour of the day to his self-created environment.

      For instance, if it's Monday and 7:30 comes up, you have to dis-adapt from your domestic surroundings and re-adapt yourself to an entirely different environment. 8:00 means everybody has to look busy. 10:30 means you can stop looking busy for 15 minutes. And then you have to look busy again. And so your day is chopped into pieces, and in each segment of time you adapt to a new set circumstances.

      No wonder some people go off the rails a bit...

      The Gods Must Be crazy (1)

      The Gods must be crazy

      Banned in Trinidad and Tobago by Eric Williams’ government.

      20 Jun 2012

      Thought for tomorrow

      Throughout theological history we have been assured by religious leaders that if we perform certain rituals, repeat certain prayers or mantras, conform to certain patterns, suppress our desires, control our thoughts, sublimate our passions, limit our appetites and refrain from sexual indulgence, we shall, after sufficient torture of the mind and body, find something beyond this little life. And that is what millions of so-called religious people have done through the ages, either in isolation, going off into the desert or into the mountains or a cave or wandering from village to village with a begging bowl, or, in a group, joining a monastery, forcing their minds to conform to an established pattern. But a tortured mind, a broken mind, a mind which wants to escape from all turmoil, which has denied the outer world and been made dull through discipline and conformity ‐ such a mind, however long it seeks, will find only according to its own distortion.

      - J. Krishnamurti in ‘Freedom from the Known’ p4.

      10 May 2012

      Thought for tomorrow

      Truth demands the hard confession: that thought and spirit come badly off, in the long run, against nature.

      - Thomas Mann

      1 Apr 2012

      Tamasic

      Word of the day: 'tamasic'.

      I've been judged by an intelligent individual (who will remain nameless - and no it's not a mental patient) as being involved wholly or in part in "tamasic" qualities. This is taken as intended to mean any one or all of the following: I'm a lazy irresponsible cheat, who is malicious, insensitive, criticising, fault-finding, frustrating, aimless in my living, lacking in logical thinking or planning, and I make excuses for all the above and more. It also means I overeat, oversleep and consume alcohol and drugs. Reference - Wikipedia.

      The above judgement, is founded on no appraisal of facts or evidence taken in proper context, that is shared with me or discussed with me [read that again]. That's called fair - by the way - cuz it's such a busy world. No marks for me, for my criticism of things that are referenced and reasoned on hard evidence. In fact to be not-tamasic, one should not criticise period! ;) [Got it?]

      I'm meant to admit that if the above is 'factually' and 'contextually' true about enduring aspects of character [note the words carefully chosen] - then I'm totally insightless and will probably remain that way for quite sometime. That I'm willing to put this here - will then be taken to mean (one or more of the following):

      1. there must be an element of truth in it (why else would you be bothered to go on about it?) - never mind if that truth of the word tamasic applies to large numbers of people including possibly you who reads this.
      2. The sum total of the description is 100% the truth - and I'm actually mortally wounded
      3. that I'm defensively or defiantly putting it here in a lame attempt to pretend I'm not mortally wounded.
      4. that I'm pretending that I'm not pretending to be mortally wounded

      Those who clutch 'tamasic feelings' towards me that are so far undisclosed, will collectively punch the air!! And those who are commanded by unconscious religious brainwashing to judge others in this way, will join in - no doubt. Today is your day too! Enjoy.

      On the grounds that s/he who asserts is burdened to prove/reason with real evidence (a tall 'untamasic' order, I should add) - I will not be attempting to prove that I'm not 'tamasic'. It's like being accused of sexual infidelity. How do you prove you've shagged no one?!!! People are entitled to their opinions and perceptions - which they justify in their heads. And they may justify their opinions based on cursory reading of comments on Facebook!!! One thing they don't know - is what they don't know. Self-justified opinions have one important quality i.e. they are 'tamasic' in nature.

      It's interesting that it's such fast-paced world - with people rushing around so madly - few have time to know a person for real. Instead if they spot a few comments on FB, a few emails, or some blog - they make judgements - which they know are right. Of course everybody – except me - is entitled to judge other people. I’m not sure why such an inequality exists. Thankfully my circle 'self-selects' and 'self-deselects' those types.

      I have never said I was a perfect being - however, my imperfections do not disqualify me from making statements that are lawful, reasoned and evidence-based - whilst remaining open to new opinion and evidence.

      Thought for tomorrow

      “Four things come not back: the spoken word, the sped arrow, the past life and the neglected opportunity.”

      - Anon (probably Arabian in origin).

      30 Jan 2012

      The Unthinkable

      My thoughts which follow have been deeply and uncomfortably compelled by the movie ‘Unthinkable’. This movie comes with a health warning – as it shows graphic scenes of torture. If you are likely to suffer stress or ill-health do not watch this movie.

      Adult audiences only.

      I'm not here to change anyone's mind on anything. I have not changed my mind on anything. I am here to explore an issue - not to prove that torture should be made legal.

      This film has brought me to consider that, if one believes that a minority of persons should be allowed to use the rights afforded by humanity to effect total destruction of the human race, then there is never room for torture as a consideration. In such a doomsday scenario - even if it could never happen in your estimation - we're doomed.

      Absolute rights afforded to individuals in the present therefore stand to be used to effect absolute annihilation of the human race at some point in the future. It may be not tomorrow, maybe in 20 years (no one could predict exactly when), but at some point when the power to destroy the world’s population falls into the hands of a core minority so inclined, we will stare self-destruction in the face. The statues of the morally invincible will stand tall and glorious even if a bit beaten, for no one of our degree of sentience to admire (or condemn) – if we don’t cross this bridge before we reach it.

      You and your politicians need to consider whether absolute rights can or ought to be protected in the face of a real threat of absolute destruction of the human race. [As a minor distraction asteroid impact was never seen as a serious threat until a few years ago. In comparison the world stands at greater risk of self-destruction by terrorist minds over the next 50 - 100 years.] And perhaps some politicians have already thought about the subject (of torture) behind closed doors. However, it is not possible for obvious political reasons for politicians to declare that serious consideration should be given legalising torture in certain extreme circumstances.

      What has happened in Guantanamo (and other places) - and is quite probably happening now as you read this - in floating facilities out at sea, is that they are outfoxing the law and various Constitutions. The human race has always found ways of breaking all known laws. Governments around the world have consistently demonstrated (in my observations) that they are willing to tear up Constitutions and Treaties when the going 'gets rough'. They go 'underground' and out of the sight or reach of the law - and illegal activity happens there - that cannot be proved. The law can only bite where it's teeth can reach! No - I don't have hard evidence of that. I'm not a crime buster of governments.

      My purpose is to deal with a matter of 'efficacy' - and in one specific scenario - of potential total annihilation, I'm unable to see how the balance should be allowed to swing to annihilation. Should rights afforded to protect individuals be used to infringe upon the rights of the human race to survival? This is what compelled me to think about the unthinkable... at great discomfort to myself, even if I attract it. ;) Efficacy becomes important when the world is faced (eventually) with a total loss scenario. Efficacy of any method of allowing sufficient numbers to carry on the race will be important. 

      For the avoidance of all doubt - I am well aware of expert opinion about why torture fails, why it is illegal and immoral - and I accept and defend all such opinions. However, my above (and more) concerns are what has compelled me to thing about the unthinkable... that possibly there could be a case for 'torture'. ‘A case’ means a single case. The above is not intended to be an argument to prove that torture should be legalised – and it should not be so used.

      19 Nov 2011

      Jiddu Krishnamurti – the reluctant ‘messiah’.

      jk

      It has taken me about three-weeks of reading and listening to video material for 15 hours, to come to write this. So much in awe am I, about this great soul. I had read one of his books in my late teens and sadly did not realise at the time that he was alive. And even more sadly, did not know he had passed away in 1986. George Bernard Shaw had declared that he was the most beautiful human being he had ever met and Aldous Huxley became one of his close friends. What follows is a really amazing story – and I warmly invite you to follow it. It could be life-changing.

      Krishnamurti (May 12, 1895 – February 17, 1986) was an extraordinary man, who made an important mark on this world – even if many do not know of him. Krishnamurti was born into a Telugu Brahmin family in what was then colonial India. It was the unique sequence of the death of Krishnamurti’s mother, when he was 10; his father, Jiddu Narayaniah, seeking post-retirement income – having left the colonial British Administration; his father’s association with the Theosophical Society (based in Adyar) that led his father to move Adyar in Madras – which all ‘triangulated’ to facilitate discovery of young Krishnamurti. Those events would lead to Charles Leadbeater of the Theosophical Society finding Krishnamurti, on behalf of Annie Besant (then president of the Society).

      Early life history and development…

      Wikipedia has done a really extensive write up on Krishnamurti. I’ve decided to give most references at the end so as not to cause too many distractions. In fact I’m adding references long after I’ve posted this. However, video is worth a zillion words! Click that on the left and there’s more below.

      Below I continue to excerpt and crystallise key parts of a truly exceptional 90-year life history from parts of Wikipedia and elsewhere.

      Hereafter Krishnamurti is referred to as K – as he was affectionately called by many a friend.

      Defining himself
      His father was initially reluctant to cooperate, but later acceded, recognising the advantage to his son, and that he could not independently acquire the means to place his son in the position of advantage that the Society were offering.
      The Theosophical Society was actually in search of a new leader who would bring a new enlightenment to the world by unifying spiritual and religious movements. They were a western organisation with strong links in England. Charles Leadbeater of the Theosophical Society was said to have clairvoyant powers, and found K on banks of the river-village of Adyar, at the age of 14. Leadbeater asserted that Krishnamurti had one of the purest most innocent auras ever observed and selected him to become the next messiah. K was then selected groomed for that role.
      Dissolution
      England
      Krishnamurti and his brother Nityananda were adopted by Annie Besant and taken to England in April 1911. K spent the next ten years of his life in England under a very carefully managed regime of exercise, education and meditation. His acquired command of English was astounding. He mastered English in about six months it was reported. He did not excel academically and failed to enter Oxford as it was intended by the Society. He was confronted by ridicule as in England about being the ‘chosen one’. He lived a luxurious life but without much privacy. He yearned to find peace and time to himself to think.

      America
      In 1922 on a trip to the United States, he found privacy and relaxation. He and his brother Nitya, found peach in the Ojai Valley in California. He was able to re-embrace nature and found a freedom he once had when running around on the beach in the Bay of Bengal at the mouth of the river Adyar. While he enjoyed that, there was growing expectation from the Theosophists that he would deliver their message. His skills in oration and use of English grew even more. The Theosophists created a separate organisation called ‘The Order of the Star in the East’ specifically to take care of his needs and to facilitate the Theosophical Society’s ultimate mission. K was never at peace with all this and he tried his best to say so.

      On 17th August of 1922 K had unusual experience. It lasted three days and featured him feeling very hot, being intermittently confused, and regressed in his behaviour. There was a ball-like swelling in the base of his neck at the start of the first episode. On the second day he was according to three witnesses including Nitya, visited by Lord Maitreya. On the third day three unknown ‘figures’ were seen around him. They were not described further in Nitya’s notes. These episodes, referred to as ‘the process’  recurred at intervals until K’s death. But they had occurred almost every night between mid-August and December 1922. Nitya had made detailed notes of all these goings on and had sent a long narrative to Mrs Besant.

      Nitya who had been suffering with intermittent bouts of tuberculosis, died suddenly and unexpectedly on 13th November 1929 due to complications of flu and tuberculosis. This shook K’s faith in Theosophy even more because he was assurances by the movement about Nitya’s health. Nitya was the only person he could speak with openly and in complete confidence. His passing away was said to break Krishnamurti – but not for long. Twelve days later K resiled and there was no hint that he was disturbed by Nitya’s death. However, it was clear that Nitya’s death shattered the last vestiges of faith he had held for the Theosophist’s grand plan.

      Tensions continued to rise between K and the dyad of Annie Besant and Leadbeater. Long into the grooming process, on August 3rd, 1929, at the age of 34 – twenty years after he was selected and supposedly well prepared to take up ‘post’ -  he decided to dissolve his intended role and The Order of the Star of the East. This put a serious dent in the plans of the Theosophical Society. He returned all money and property to given to him by the Order, including a castle in Holland and 5000 acres of land to various donors.

      He continued his life’s work in humility – never seeking accolades or awards, never accepting followers or worshippers, seeing relationships between the ‘disciple and guru’ as potentially exploitative and creating dependence. He provided doubt, scepticism and tools for looking within. He travelled the world extensively and shared his thoughts. He accepted gifts and financial support from people who felt inspired by his work. He left behind a staggering set of writings, video and audio.

      In his later years, K  acknowledged the strange turn of events in his childhood and said that if Leadbeater had not found him, “I would have died”. A lot of stuff went on in K’s life.. too much to cram into this blog.

      K gave his last talk on 4th January 1986 his last words in that talk were: “Creation is something that is most holy. That’s the most sacred thing in life and if you have made a mess of your life, change it. Change it today, not tomorrow. If you are uncertain find out why and be certain. If your thinking is not straight, think straight, logically. Unless all that is prepared, all that is settled, you can’t enter into this world of creation.
      It ends.
      “ (The last two words were barely audible and would not have been heard by the audience, but recorded on tape).

      Fascinating -  that K in his last public talk, told people to recognise where their thinking was not straight and to do something about it. I cannot help but connect this to my own thoughts on Inefficient Thinking.

      K’s death
      Krishnamurti died ten minutes after midnight on 17th February 1986. He was not alone. He had contracted cancer. He was losing much weight in December 1985 and January 1986. Tests subsequently confirmed a cancer of the liver and/or pancreas. K was in severe pain and treated intermittently with morphine. He came to realise the end was nigh and he coped with it masterfully.

      On the morning of 7th February 1986 K was asked a question written to him by Mary Cardogan, ‘When Krishnaji dies what really happens to that extraordinary focus of understanding and energy that is K?’ K swiftly responded, "It is gone. If someone goes wholly into the teachings perhaps they might touch that; but one cannot try to touch it.’ He paused and added, “If you all only knew what you have missed – that vast emptiness.  Later that morning it appeared that the question lingered in his mind. He recorded the following, his last recorded words:

      “I was telling them this morning – for seventy years that super-energy – no – that immense energy, immense intelligence, has been using this body. I don’t think people realise what tremendous energy and intelligence went through this body – there’s twelve-cylinder engine. And for seventy years – was a pretty long time – and now the body can’t stand any more. Nobody, unless the body has been prepared, very carefully, protected and so on – nobody can understand what went through this body. Nobody. Don’t anybody pretend. Nobody. I repeat this: nobody amongst us or the public, know what went on. I know they don’t. And now after seventy years it has come to an end. Not that that intelligence and energy – it’s somewhat here, every day, and especially at night. And after seventy years the body can’t stand it – can’t stand any more. It can’t. The Indians have a lot of damned superstitions about this – that you will and the body goes – and all that kind of nonsense. You won’t find another body like this, or that supreme intelligence operating in a body for many hundred years. You won’t see it again. When he goes, it goes. There is no consciousness left behind of that consciousness, of that state. They’ll all pretend or try to imagine they can get into touch with that. Perhaps they will somewhat if they live the teachings. But nobody has done it. Nobody. And so that’s that.”

      Note carefully that he refers to seventy years four times. This was clearly not his 70th year!! His intellect was fine until the end. It is unlikely that he would that mistake four times in a row. I think that something happened when he was around 20, that is unknown or undiscovered by many of us. K was the sort of person that left you to discover, he did ‘teachings’ but did not see himself as a teacher – recall that he avoided being a leader, guru or person in authority. Note also that he said ‘..it’s somewhere here, every day, and especially at night’; referring to something that of tremendous energy and intelligence that had been ‘using’ his body. I think that the events between August and December 1922 were probably what he was alluding to – because it appeared that something so powerful overtook his body and mind that he was in agony repeatedly at that time. And note that most of the episodes he had ‘endured’ occurred at night. However, his states of altered consciousness were seen as a driver for his exploration of the mind and the human condition.

      Conclusion
      K’s
      selflessness and his new brand of philosophy or spirituality, made a deep impact on millions of lives across the world. That impact was probably much less extensive than if he had held to his predestined path, as was planned by the Theosophical Society. However, Krishnamurti’s steely determination never to impose truths on people or to lead them as a guru, would set a rock-solid foundation for those who were of similar determination, to find reality. Uncharacteristically, K said, “.. there is no teacher.. no pupil..there is no leader...” – a set of views that would fly in the face of many organised Eastern and Western spiritual groups and religions. He further asserted that It is said by Wikipedia that “Krishnamurti's lasting influence is hard to gauge in an objective way; there is no organizational or other entity based on his philosophy, whose progress can be measured. His insistence that there be no successors or interpreters has so far  prevented any individual or group from claiming to represent a continuity, or a unique understanding, of his philosophy.” It’s not for me to decide upon that. I am simply thankful for Krishnamurti's life and his ‘light’. Where and how I shine that light is up to me – as he would probably have said.

      References:

      1. Wikipedia – Krishnamurti
      2. image

      7 Oct 2011

      Death.. the single best invention of life!–Jobs

      I'm listening very carefully to Steve Jobs! If you're too busy for this - having to feed that dog or sommat -  at least scroll the video to 11:40 and take a minute or two from there. I'm printing these words and sticking them in front of my desk, "No one wants to die. Even people who want to go to heaven don’t want to die to get there. And yet death is the destination we all share. No one has ever escaped it. And that is as it should be, because death is very likely the single best invention of life. It is life’s change agent. It clears out the old to make way for the new."

      Thanks Steve! You’ve changed many lives and parts of the world.

      Jobs had a relapse of cancer after he had surgery for a more treatable form in 2004.

      It’s sad that we often discover people and their wisdom after they pass on. Very sad indeed.

      [Thanks to blogger aka_lol @ http://akalol.wordpress.com/ for bringing this to me].

      27 Aug 2011

      This could change your life

      In just a few minutes these videos from a great man could change the way you live your life. Yes – there is a dog to feed somewhere, a bill to pay, a leaking tap to fix, or that link on Amazon to click. It’s up to you of course, whether you look and listen now – or you say you’ll see it ‘later’ – and we all know that’s most unlikely. So – if you’re 100% satisfied with your life look away now!

      “It’s not about how to achieve your dreams; it’s about how to lead your life!”
      What wisdom would we impart to the world if it was our last chance?